Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Oct 2005 01:10:52 -0400
Oliver Wong wrote:
(snip)
> For example, I am working on a programming language in which the
> division operation is represented by the unicode character U+00F7
> instead of the traditional slash character. I don't expect this
> language to ever become anything more than a toy language, though,
> because of the inconvenience of actually entering in the U+00F7
> character.
Character set may be one reason APL didn't succeed any better than it
did. WEll, that and it being hard to read, what some called a write
only language.
As far as a language without english keywords, though, APL would have
to be one, or pretty close to it anyway.
-- glen
[It's not just the character set. There's a successor to APL called
J that uses normal characters, and it hasn't caught on either. -John]
.
- References:
- compiler for Chinese development language
- From: gentlezhao
- Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: Ganny
- Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- From: Oliver Wong
- compiler for Chinese development language
- Prev by Date: Re: Using Flex and Bison
- Next by Date: Re: Why context-free?
- Previous by thread: Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- Next by thread: Re: compiler for Chinese development language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|