Re: What's new in lcc-win
- From: jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:27:37 +0100
Ben Bacarisse wrote:
I remember doing quote a bit of scientific programming a long time
ago, and modifying the parts of complex number was not a common thing
to do. I may be wrong about that, but I would not worry about it.
You are in principle correct.
In practic, I see a LOT of code that uses the real and
imaginary parts separate because there wasn't any complex support
until C99. For instance all the code translated from fortran
subroutines in netlib handles the complex parts separately.
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
.
- References:
- What's new in lcc-win
- From: jacob navia
- Re: What's new in lcc-win
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: What's new in lcc-win
- From: jacob navia
- Re: What's new in lcc-win
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- What's new in lcc-win
- Prev by Date: Re: What's new in lcc-win
- Previous by thread: Re: What's new in lcc-win
- Next by thread: VLA parameters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|