Re: Declarations...ordering
- From: "Mike H" <mikehg1@removethis foraccess-4-free.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:35:43 -0400
"jacob navia" <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4344d25f$0$7837$8fcfb975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mike H wrote:
>
>> Does LCC accept either of these ordering conventions now ?
>>
>> __declspec(dllexport) __stdcall int SQUARED (int A)
>>
>> __declspec(dllexport) int __stdcall SQUARED (int A)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike H.
>>
>>
> looks like. lcc-win32 doesn't crash neither it burns
> so I suppose it works.
>
> Why?
> You have a problem?
>
Hi Jacob,
At one time, I'm not sure what version? Lcc-Win32 did not accept the
second syntax. By chance I had used it and noticed Lcc didn't complain, but
I wasn't sure if it was just a fluke :)
Thanks,
Mike H.
.
- References:
- Declarations...ordering
- From: Mike H
- Re: Declarations...ordering
- From: jacob navia
- Declarations...ordering
- Prev by Date: Re: lcc-Win32 setup window has no height
- Next by Date: WS_TABSTOP not defined
- Previous by thread: Re: Declarations...ordering
- Next by thread: What's new in lcc-win32
- Index(es):