Re: Solidity for SolidWorks?

On Jan 23, 9:49 am, kidnappedbraintea...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
There are countless threads on every news group regarding the UI v.
Bugs issue. Unfortunately, flashy new features sells software,
stability does not.

Which is why we need to write.

Bo
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Solidity for SolidWorks?
    ... Bugs issue. ... Unfortunately, flashy new features sells software, ... stability does not. ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)
  • Re: Solidity for SolidWorks?
    ... Unfortunately, flashy new features sells software, ... stability does not. ... What is your take on the news from SWW? ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)
  • Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
    ... There are always tradeoffs between stability and features. ... to declaring 5.X "STABLE" until all the major bugs were fixed. ... running freebsd servers around the world will suffer problems because ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
    ... >> need to be included and what bugs need to be fixed. ... >> There are always tradeoffs between stability and features. ... For my production mail and firewall servers, ... > existed in 5.x but no new feature to shout about. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: NEWBIE: guidence for MS-Windows replacement.
    ... the linux discussion belongs, ofcourse, in c.o.l.a. ... Fewest bugs, well, all I'll say about that is that the *BSD camps have ... This contributes to their stability. ... FreeBSD included. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)