Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: "John Kreutzberger" <jk_nospam_design@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:03:49 -0800
> The special override box is new in 2006. It has always been possible to
> simply delete the "<DIM>" from the dimension and add you own number. I
> think the real functional difference is that the tolerance tools will
> repspect the number added in the override box, but not a text replacement
> of "<DIM>".
>
> When this appeared, I made some noise about how bad an idea I thought it
> was (beta forums, I think), and recommended that if they insist on
> including this feature, then they should also include a marker that the
> dimensions is not to scale, such as the customary underlining.
Thanks for clarifying that Dale. I never thought to try and replace the
<DIM> ; nor would I want to. The new over-ride box got my attention, though.
I agree that there should be some marker showing that the value was
over-ridden.
jk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: cadPIRATE
- Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- References:
- Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: John Kreutzberger
- Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: cadishaq
- Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: John Kreutzberger
- Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- From: Dale Dunn
- Dimension over-ride?!?
- Prev by Date: Re: My complaint about VX Corporation
- Next by Date: Re: How to extract center of mass dimensions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- Next by thread: Re: Dimension over-ride?!?
- Index(es):