Re: dual core processor
- From: "Wayne Tiffany" <wayne.tiffanyRMVJUNK@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:40:32 -0500
Maybe this explains it???? I turned on HT and now can see 2
processors both in Device Manager & Task Manager. So dual core at this time
is a myth???
Intel® Processor Family
Projected Platform Release Date
Intel® Itanium® 2 Dual-Core Processor
4QTR, 2005
Intel® XeonT Dual-Core Processor MP
4QTR, 2005
Intel® XeonT Dual-Core Processor
4QTR, 2005
None of the Intel links list dual core - bah humbug! What a misuse of time
& expectation. I am still investigating the effect of turning HT on/off and
setting the affinity. I'm tired - time to go home to
sleeeeeeeeeeppppppzzzzzzzz..........................
WT
"MJS" <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lC4We.35944$vJ4.16154@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> HT is different than dual core. HT will only show one entry in Device
> Manager. HT is one processor core acting on threads as two whereas dual
> core is just like a dual processor (logically) even though they're still
> on one die. However, HT should still show two processors in Task Manager
> as long as the BIOS and XEON and Software support it. Did you look on
> Intel's website for the exact processor model?
>
> http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/default.aspx?familyID=5&culture=en-US
>
> http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=528
>
> and
>
> http://www.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/sb/CS-007756.htm
>
> An earlier look might have saved us some threads...
>
> Also check out John's links below for further explanation.
>
> --
>
> MJS, CSWP
>
>
> "Wayne Tiffany" <wayne.tiffanyRMVJUNK@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Kf4We.134$g16.6371431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 1. No choice there.
>>
>> 2. No, or I haven't found it, although I have studied it several times.
>>
>> 3. Haven't yet, but will.
>>
>> Read the link - interesting. I had tried HT on & off and came to the
>> conclusion that my machine was slightly better at doing other work while
>> SW was chunking away if HT were turned off. Seemed backwards, but that
>> was my gut feel. I'm not done with this thing yet.......
>>
>> WT
>>
>> "John Layne" <JohnDON'TBUGMEWITHSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> message news:XY3We.11664$iM2.1032079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Wayne Tiffany wrote:
>>>> 1 graph. However, when this machine had XP64 on it, I noticed that it
>>>> did
>>>> have two CPU graphs. I also took another look at the BIOS and it's
>>>> only
>>>> showing CPU 0: and none other. So, all this is making me wonder if
>>>> it's not
>>>> going to happen with XP32 on this machine. On the other hand, why
>>>> not??
>>>>
>>>> WT
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would suggest, (although you may have tried all this)
>>>
>>> 1. Task Manager, click the performance TAB, then View / CPU History /
>>> check One CPU per graph.
>>> http://www.solidengineering.co.nz/help/taskmanager.jpg
>>>
>>> 2. Is there a switch in the BIOS to enable both cores?
>>>
>>> 3. check to see if there is a BIOS upgrade available.
>>>
>>> And once you get it going read link below, it has some interesting
>>> reading regarding Hyperthreading. Maybe I shouldn't have turned
>>> Hyperthreading off on my clients SolidWorks PC after all.
>>>
>>> http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040528/
>>>
>>>
>>> John Layne
>>> www.solidengineering.co.nz
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- dual core processor
- From: G. Hagen
- Re: dual core processor
- From: TOP
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: John Layne
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- dual core processor
- Prev by Date: Re: dual core processor
- Next by Date: hole table for 2d profiles?
- Previous by thread: Re: dual core processor
- Next by thread: Re: dual core processor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading