Re: dual core processor



HT is different than dual core. HT will only show one entry in Device
Manager. HT is one processor core acting on threads as two whereas dual
core is just like a dual processor (logically) even though they're still
on one die. However, HT should still show two processors in Task
Manager as long as the BIOS and XEON and Software support it. Did you
look on Intel's website for the exact processor model?

http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/default.aspx?familyID=5&culture=en-US

http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=528

and

http://www.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/sb/CS-007756.htm

An earlier look might have saved us some threads...

Also check out John's links below for further explanation.

--

MJS, CSWP


"Wayne Tiffany" <wayne.tiffanyRMVJUNK@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kf4We.134$g16.6371431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 1. No choice there.
>
> 2. No, or I haven't found it, although I have studied it several
> times.
>
> 3. Haven't yet, but will.
>
> Read the link - interesting. I had tried HT on & off and came to the
> conclusion that my machine was slightly better at doing other work
> while SW was chunking away if HT were turned off. Seemed backwards,
> but that was my gut feel. I'm not done with this thing yet.......
>
> WT
>
> "John Layne" <JohnDON'TBUGMEWITHSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:XY3We.11664$iM2.1032079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Wayne Tiffany wrote:
>>> 1 graph. However, when this machine had XP64 on it, I noticed that
>>> it did
>>> have two CPU graphs. I also took another look at the BIOS and it's
>>> only
>>> showing CPU 0: and none other. So, all this is making me wonder if
>>> it's not
>>> going to happen with XP32 on this machine. On the other hand, why
>>> not??
>>>
>>> WT
>>>
>>
>> I would suggest, (although you may have tried all this)
>>
>> 1. Task Manager, click the performance TAB, then View / CPU History /
>> check One CPU per graph.
>> http://www.solidengineering.co.nz/help/taskmanager.jpg
>>
>> 2. Is there a switch in the BIOS to enable both cores?
>>
>> 3. check to see if there is a BIOS upgrade available.
>>
>> And once you get it going read link below, it has some interesting
>> reading regarding Hyperthreading. Maybe I shouldn't have turned
>> Hyperthreading off on my clients SolidWorks PC after all.
>>
>> http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040528/
>>
>>
>> John Layne
>> www.solidengineering.co.nz
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Only one core working
    ... Device manager shows two processors ... Sisoft Sandra shows one processor (one core) ... Have updated ASUS Bios to latest 507, ... Yet only one chart appears on Task Manager graph, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: CPU upgrade: now wont boot into Normal Mode?
    ... 530 system BIOS to play with, there wasn't anything there to change! ... I'm still considering the BIOS upgrade option as you mentioned) ... dual-core (non Celeron) versions, but I wasn't sure if that would buy me all ... Oh, while I have you on the phone here, do you have any predictions as to any noticeable difference between using the dual-core Celeron vs the single core one? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: dualcore
    ... Do control-alt-delete and bring up the Task Manager. ... One graph is for core 0 and the other graph for core 1. ... If you have "transplanted" your Windows ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Dual Core issue
    ... Ben...my device manager is showing that same entry twice. ... core. ... I am sure you only have one enabled, thus only one graph in TM. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: CPU upgrade: now wont boot into Normal Mode?
    ... I went ahead and flashed the BIOS, ... dual core was considerably more nimble. ... Intel Pentium version like the Intel Pentium E2140 or E2160, ... I would expect some dual core to ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)