Re: dual core processor
- From: "MJS" <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:01:53 GMT
HT is different than dual core. HT will only show one entry in Device
Manager. HT is one processor core acting on threads as two whereas dual
core is just like a dual processor (logically) even though they're still
on one die. However, HT should still show two processors in Task
Manager as long as the BIOS and XEON and Software support it. Did you
look on Intel's website for the exact processor model?
http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/default.aspx?familyID=5&culture=en-US
http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=528
and
http://www.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/sb/CS-007756.htm
An earlier look might have saved us some threads...
Also check out John's links below for further explanation.
--
MJS, CSWP
"Wayne Tiffany" <wayne.tiffanyRMVJUNK@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kf4We.134$g16.6371431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 1. No choice there.
>
> 2. No, or I haven't found it, although I have studied it several
> times.
>
> 3. Haven't yet, but will.
>
> Read the link - interesting. I had tried HT on & off and came to the
> conclusion that my machine was slightly better at doing other work
> while SW was chunking away if HT were turned off. Seemed backwards,
> but that was my gut feel. I'm not done with this thing yet.......
>
> WT
>
> "John Layne" <JohnDON'TBUGMEWITHSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:XY3We.11664$iM2.1032079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Wayne Tiffany wrote:
>>> 1 graph. However, when this machine had XP64 on it, I noticed that
>>> it did
>>> have two CPU graphs. I also took another look at the BIOS and it's
>>> only
>>> showing CPU 0: and none other. So, all this is making me wonder if
>>> it's not
>>> going to happen with XP32 on this machine. On the other hand, why
>>> not??
>>>
>>> WT
>>>
>>
>> I would suggest, (although you may have tried all this)
>>
>> 1. Task Manager, click the performance TAB, then View / CPU History /
>> check One CPU per graph.
>> http://www.solidengineering.co.nz/help/taskmanager.jpg
>>
>> 2. Is there a switch in the BIOS to enable both cores?
>>
>> 3. check to see if there is a BIOS upgrade available.
>>
>> And once you get it going read link below, it has some interesting
>> reading regarding Hyperthreading. Maybe I shouldn't have turned
>> Hyperthreading off on my clients SolidWorks PC after all.
>>
>> http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040528/
>>
>>
>> John Layne
>> www.solidengineering.co.nz
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- References:
- dual core processor
- From: G. Hagen
- Re: dual core processor
- From: TOP
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: MJS
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- Re: dual core processor
- From: John Layne
- Re: dual core processor
- From: Wayne Tiffany
- dual core processor
- Prev by Date: Re: dual core processor
- Next by Date: Re: dual core processor
- Previous by thread: Re: dual core processor
- Next by thread: Re: dual core processor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|