Re: calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- From: Andrew Beckett <andrewb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:20:51 +0000
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:29:50 +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn.are@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>In article <11lvfbrecakko4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>cad_support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> > Hope for some help,
>> Hi Svenn,
>> I can t understand why you have the transitions outside the loop.
>
>Simply because of the warning statements in the manual that $transition
>should not be executed conditionally, and I have always thought that
>while() is a conditional statement.
>
>I hadn't even thought about moving them inside the when() block and I
>will try to do so, but I would also like to hear why it would be OK to
>ignore the warning
>
>
>
Hi Svenn,
A quick answer here - don't have the time to try out your code to figure out
what is going on.
Anyway, you might want to consider using the "static" analysis instead of "ic",
since this is the DC that preceeds transient etc.
And putting transient inside any conditional is a bad move. It needs to be
evaluated on every iteration, otherwise you loose the history information about
the previous state of a signal, and it will do odd things...
Andrew.
.
- References:
- calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- From: Svenn Are Bjerkem
- Re: calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- From: fogh
- Re: calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- From: Svenn Are Bjerkem
- calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: ocnPrint() problem in spectre
- Next by Date: Re: *Error* unknown: dbSetq: Can not set attribute
- Previous by thread: Re: calculating a config word during operating point analysis
- Next by thread: About corner simulation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading