Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- From: "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <ag-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:35:58 -0700
Jean-Marc Bourguet wrote:
nmm1@xxxxxxxxx writes:
In article <0CSem.234715$bA.46710@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
If anyone wants to learn more about this mess, my Objects document
describes the situation with many references to the C and C++ standards.
Is it somewhere publicly accessible?
I'm waiting to see it.
--
The content of this message is my personal opinion only.
Although I am an employee - currently of Intel,
in the past of other computer companies such as AMD, Motorola, and Gould
- I reveal this only so that the reader may account
for any possible bias I may have towards my employer's products.
The statements I make here in no way represent my employer's position,
nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of my employer.
In fact, this posting may not even represent my personal opinion,
since occasionally I play devil's advocate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- From: nmm1
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- References:
- HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Andy \"Krazy\" Glew
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Andy \"Krazy\" Glew
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- From: Jean-Marc Bourguet
- HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Prev by Date: Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Next by Date: Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Previous by thread: Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- Next by thread: Re: HardBound and SoftBound
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
