Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <ag-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:15:02 -0700
Robert Myers wrote:
I don't think that what Andy has proposed
Not me. Not in this news string. (Although I proposed similar stuff earlier in comp.arch.)
Credit Milo Martin and his students such as Joe DeVietti.
I'm just a fan.
I don't think that what Andy has proposed is necessarily a waste of
hardware, transistors, performance, or money, but it may lead to even
more sloppy programming. I don't worry much about syntax because it
costs little to get the compiler to find the errors. I'm not so sure
things would be better if programmers were counting on the hardware to
catch programming and conceptual errors.
I share this concern.
HardBound and SoftBound would lead to more system interruptions. Instead of a buffer overflow allowing a bad guy to break into your system, they would take the subsystem down. But the webserver would reboot or restart.
There might be fewer bugs overall, however, because more would be caught in testing.
---
It's a lot like Java and Javascript: the ability to fix bugs easily in production has led to initial code drops often being buggier than in the old days.
--
The content of this message is my personal opinion only.
Although I am an employee - currently of Intel,
in the past of other computer companies such as AMD, Motorola, and Gould
- I reveal this only so that the reader may account
for any possible bias I may have towards my employer's products.
The statements I make here in no way represent my employer's position,
nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of my employer.
In fact, this posting may not even represent my personal opinion,
since occasionally I play devil's advocate.
.
- References:
- HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Andy \"Krazy\" Glew
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Terje Mathisen
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Andy \"Krazy\" Glew
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Terje Mathisen
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- From: Robert Myers
- HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Prev by Date: Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Next by Date: Re: Moving to the Net: Encrypted Execution for User Code on a Hosting
- Previous by thread: Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Next by thread: Re: HardBound and SoftBound (was "The State of Software")
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|