Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: Stephen Fuld <SFuld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:44:25 -0700
nmm1@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
snip
If any major vendor
made a "green line" of desktops and blades, using laptop power targets
but otherwise with normal desktop/server specifications, they could
easily reduce then power by a quarter while reducing the performance
by only a factor of two.
Is that really true? I agree that you would save on CPU, but RAM is the same, and presumably you want the increased power of a large screen and the capacity of a 3.5 in disk (rather than the laptop's 2.5). Low end desktops already use integrated graphics so you don't save much there. You might save a little by eliminating the extra ports, etc. but you might want to preserve expandability. I'm not sure just going to a laptop type CPU would save 1/4 of the total system power.
--
- Stephen Fuld
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: nmm1
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: Robert Swindells
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- References:
- DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: Robert Myers
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: Rick Jones
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: nmm1
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: Rick Jones
- Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- From: nmm1
- DARPA, at least, has a clue
- Prev by Date: Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- Next by Date: Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- Previous by thread: Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- Next by thread: Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|