comp.arch

• Thread Index

---

• Apparently the first real info on PlayStation4 from Japan
  • From: AirRaid
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Niels Jørgen Kruse
• Re: Infiniband: is DDR backwards compatible?
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Infiniband: is DDR backwards compatible?
  • From: koof
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Tag Heuer Link Automatic Chronograph Ayrton Senna 2004 Limited Edition CJF2113.BA0576
  • From: hualibao118
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: ArarghMail809NOSPAM
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Joe Pfeiffer
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: ArarghMail809NOSPAM
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Robert Myers
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: reasonablereliability
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Guy Macon
• The Fly in the Teraflop Ointment
  • From: Quadibloc
• Omega DeVille Watches: Quality Omega Discount Watches
  • From: blog644
• Seiko Coutura Watches: Quality Seiko Discount Watches
  • From: blog644
• Citizen Calibre 8700 Watches: Quality Citizen Discount Watches
  • From: blog644
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Ken Hagan
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: vladimir
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• CFP: ISNN2009 (May 26-29, 2009; Wuhan, China)
  • From: WCCI2008
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: reasonablereliability
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Intel-CPU-Question
  • From: MitchAlsup
• The Co-Operative Assembly
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Political Information Structure
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Co-Operative Assembly
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: kenney
• Chipkill protection with less than 36 chips?
  • From: reasonablereliability
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Piotr Wyderski
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Piotr Wyderski
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Anthony Williams
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Anthony Williams
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Stephen Fuld
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: ChrisQ
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Anthony Williams
• Re: Fiber-optic supercomputer cluster node interconnect?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Fiber-optic supercomputer cluster node interconnect?
  • From: mike3
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: ChrisQ
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Anthony Williams
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: PinfoNet
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: PinfoNet
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Mark F
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• rules of fixed-point arithmetic
  • From: Sam Green
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Bengt Larsson
• Re: Fiber-optic supercomputer cluster node interconnect?
  • From: Del Cecchi
• Re: Technology Problems
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• PinfoNet
  • From: Mark G. Meyers
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Michel Hack
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: EricP
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Bengt Larsson
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Paul A. Clayton
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Paul A. Clayton
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Michel Hack
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Ken Hagan
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: Fiber-optic supercomputer cluster node interconnect?
  • From: Larry
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Intel needs a console deal to get Larrabee off the ground
  • From: NV55
• [OT] Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Fiber-optic supercomputer cluster node interconnect?
  • From: mike3
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Chris Gray
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Don Lindsay
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Michel Hack
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP
• FAST '09 Call For Papers Deadline Approaching
  • From: Lionel Garth Jones
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Michael Hohmuth
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• CFP: SMART'09 - 3rd Workshop on Statistical and Machine learning approaches applied to ARchitectures and compilaTion
  • From: Grigori Fursin
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Eugene . Styer
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: David W Schroth
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Stephen Fuld
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Stephen Fuld
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Tim McCaffrey
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Torben Ægidius Mogensen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Ken Hagan
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Wilco Dijkstra
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Stephen Fuld
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: already5chosen
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Benny Amorsen
• Who designed the interconnection of EARTH SIMULATOR?
  • From: galoistw
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Ken Hagan
• Re: Intel's Larabee, Sun's Rock; what else is New and Exciting?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Intel's Larabee, Sun's Rock; what else is New and Exciting?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Intel's Larabee, Sun's Rock; what else is New and Exciting?
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: Michael Hohmuth
• Re: Some confusion about virtual cache
  • From: EricP

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.arch  > 2008-09