Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: 28 Aug 2007 08:25:35 GMT
In article <5jgbh5F3s5h8jU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= <jvorbrueggen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|>
|> > Not really. Why should it? Think about it at an abstract (mathematical)
|> > level.
|>
|> I did, with what I remember from the 21264 (IIRC) implementation in mind.
Oh, yes, I am not denying that most systems are implemented the way that
you say - I am merely saying that it isn't necessarily the best approach.
The Alpha is/was not exceptional in that respect.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- References:
- Variable-sized pages and TLB
- From: Piotr Wyderski
- Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Variable-sized pages and TLB
- Prev by Date: Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- Next by Date: Re: Is a RISC chip more expensive?
- Previous by thread: Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- Next by thread: Re: Variable-sized pages and TLB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|