Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: anton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Anton Ertl)
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:06:45 GMT
"David Kanter" <dkanter@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
PPC does not have multiple sources if you want high performance, and
in that regard, SPARC is somewhat better.
I count only one source for SPARC, either (Fujitsu). A better point
for your argument is PPC64.
With SPARC you can't really run Linux.
I have used Linux-SPARC systems; I guess they were unreally running
Linux.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl Some things have to be seen to be believed
anton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Most things have to be believed to be seen
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: Casper H . S . Dik
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: David Kanter
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- References:
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: David Kanter
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: David Kanter
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: Casper H . S . Dik
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- From: David Kanter
- Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- Prev by Date: Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- Next by Date: Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- Previous by thread: Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- Next by thread: Re: How Intel Can Save the Itanium!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|