Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eugene Miya)
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 14:48:35 -0700
What Fortran compiler besides LRLTRAN/CVC was written in itself?
Hey's it's c.c.'s moderator!
In article <ed4q25$pfd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John L <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
IBM's Fortran H was mostly written in itself. I see from some notes I
found on the web that it was about 27K lines of Fortran and 16K lines
of assembler.
Really? About when was that (release level or something?).
I thought it was mostly assembly language.
It has some poorly documented extensions for structure-like things
that as far as I know were only used in the compiler itself.
Hmmmm.
Gotta run to another meeting.
--c.p.'s moderator.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: John L
- Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- References:
- Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: Chris Barts
- Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: Eugene Miya
- Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- From: John L
- Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- Prev by Date: Re: Admired designs / designs to study
- Next by Date: Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- Previous by thread: Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- Next by thread: Re: Mainframe vs. Supercomputer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|