Re: Memory Mapped I/O Vs I/O Mapped I/O
- From: Sander Vesik <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
David Kanter <dkanter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"not" is often denoted in ASCII as "!", and a little less often as "~".
Why the hell would you use ~? That already is used for a fair number
of things that you wouldn't to confuse with 'not' (such as proportional
to, isomorphic to, approximately). That seems like a rather stupid
overloading.
Most probably people with way more math (math logic) background than
computer science background would use ~. Because ! doesn't look
even remotely like the sign they would rather use if they weren't
constrained by ASCII, while ~ sorta does.
DK
--
Sander
+++ Out of cheese error +++
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory Mapped I/O Vs I/O Mapped I/O
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Memory Mapped I/O Vs I/O Mapped I/O
- Prev by Date: Re: New record for spec fp peak on x86
- Next by Date: Re: crack ur brains
- Previous by thread: finding book on switch for multi-computers
- Next by thread: Re: Memory Mapped I/O Vs I/O Mapped I/O
- Index(es):