Re: Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- From: Zak <jute@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 08:17:23 +0200
Casey Hawthorne wrote:
Back in the 486 days, I wondered why newer computers couldn't have two CPU's; a 486 for x86 compatibility along with a newer Pentium design.
You could get the 486 and the i860 on a board. From http://lair.xent.com/pipermail/fork/Week-of-Mon-20050207/033587.html :
"Hauppauge made a workstation (the 4860) with both an i860 and a 486. The 486 was to take the interrupt load away from the i860."
Hauppauge does mostly TV cards now, I think.
Thomas .
- References:
- Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- From: Casey Hawthorne
- Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- Prev by Date: Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- Next by Date: Re: Intel strikes back with a parallel x86 design
- Previous by thread: Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- Next by thread: Re: Is backward compatibility with x86 architecture holding back CPU functionality?
- Index(es):