Re: Not enough parallelism in programming



On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:07:51 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Doesn't it rely on there being "spare" processors sitting in idle states,
> with cache hot on the same data set, for this to be a win? How often is
> that likely?

Please pardon my stupidity: of course there are processors sitting idle.
The whole purpose of this search for extra parallelism is to make use of
them. Duh.

Cheers,

--
Andrew

.



Relevant Pages