Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-newspost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:58:47 +1000
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:07:51 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Doesn't it rely on there being "spare" processors sitting in idle states,
> with cache hot on the same data set, for this to be a win? How often is
> that likely?
Please pardon my stupidity: of course there are processors sitting idle.
The whole purpose of this search for extra parallelism is to make use of
them. Duh.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
.
- References:
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Scott A Crosby
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Andrew Reilly
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Next by Date: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Next by thread: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|