Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Sander Vesik <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A's determinant! It does not change d - that is the point. The
> invariant that is broken is that d is not A's determinant on entry.
>
> Now exactly how can hardware detect that, in general, without
> solving the halting problem?
I don't think it *could* solve the problem even in the hypothetical case
where it could solve the halting problem. Because what is missing is any
description of intent about the value of d.
> Regards,
> Nick Maclaren.
--
Sander
+++ Out of cheese error +++
.
- References:
- Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Joe Seigh
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: David Gay
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: David Gay
- Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Not enough parallelism in programming
- Prev by Date: AMBA bus (rev.2, 1999) test support architecture
- Previous by thread: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Next by thread: Re: Not enough parallelism in programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|