Re: Itanium versus Others

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:09:11 -0500, Del Cecchi <cecchinospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote, in part:

>You might want to recheck your benchmarks if
>you think it takes 4 chips of Power5 to keep up with an Itanium.

One POWER5 module already *has* 4 chips inside it, each one dual-core.

John Savard
http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Itanium versus Others
    ... >>>You might want to recheck your benchmarks if ... >> John Savard ... >Power5 chips could be packed into MCM but they don't have to. ... >For commercial workloads Itanium is simply no match to Power5. ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: Itanium versus Others
    ... John Savard wrote: ... >>You might want to recheck your benchmarks if ... > Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server ... Power5 chips could be packed into MCM but they don't have to. ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: Itanium versus Others
    ... John Savard wrote: ... Now, of course, we have the AMD 64 chips and Intel's EM64T. ... I also came across IBM's POWER5. ... Itanium, but with a higher MHz speed. ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: Weakness of Feistel ciphers
    ... (John Savard) ... Quadibloc VII might also be of interest: ... Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server ... http://www.usenetzone.com to open account ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: No its a NEW more tiny computer !!!
    ... But the hardware requirements just keep growing too fast. ... John Savard ... Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)