Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:56 -0500
Greg Lindahl wrote:
> In article <87oe8ovf3r.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Ketil Malde <ketil+news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Parallelizing it doesn't pose any challenges, it doesn't (at least not
>>in most cases) require million-dollar top-500 machines, in fact, it
>>doesn't even require a fast interconnect.
>
> There are plenty of million-dollar loosely-coupled clusters on the
> top-500 list that run embarrassingly parallel apps.
>
> -- greg
Sure. It's the *other* apps that they run embarassingly badly. ;-}
Randy
--
Randy Crawford http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~rand rand AT rice DOT edu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- References:
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Emidio S.
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Code density and performance?
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Index(es):