Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde <ketil+news@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:16:08 +0200
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Nice example. It needs pretty much no communication
Yes, perhaps that is the problem: it isn't "interesting".
Parallelizing it doesn't pose any challenges, it doesn't (at least not
in most cases) require million-dollar top-500 machines, in fact, it
doesn't even require a fast interconnect. It's just an application
that some users would like to run with a minimum of hassle (and who
gives a damn about *them*?)
It's fairly typical, though.
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- References:
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Emidio S.
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by Date: Re: RISC outside of SPECCPU
- Previous by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Index(es):