Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:45:50 -0700
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
(snip)
wasn't exactly what i had in mind, ... there are a lot of (mega) "on-line" applications run in batch environments ... because the batch environments have evolved a lot of "automated" conventions for handling numerous types of events (rather than pushing them to the end user, common in interactive system). these on-line environments tend to make use of these automated facilities to help provide 7x24, continuous operation.
IBM at least used to be interested in scientific computing. They did build the 360/91 and the vector instructions for S/370.
But yes, the commercial side needs the high uptime.
-- glen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- References:
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Emidio S.
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Index(es):