Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: 26 Jul 2005 15:48:26 GMT
In article <42E6593D.1040107@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|> Ketil Malde wrote:
|> > ¹ People who were raised on punched cards may at this point feel free
|> > to vent their annoyance over the spoiled youth of today, who expect
|> > interactivity.
|>
|> my frequent observation is that the batch system developed from a
|> paradigm that the person wasn't likely to be present ...
|>
|> ... most of the world still turns on environments
|> where it isn't expected that the responsible human is present and
|> directly in control.
Yes, and it is at least as much for the convenience of the users
as anything else. I have been very blunt to several idiots who
have told me that interactive-only debuggers are worth bothering
with in the HPC arena. Do you REALLY want to sit around waiting
for a failure that occurs in one job in ten, anywhere between 6
and 24 hours into its run?
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- References:
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Emidio S.
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Randy
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: already5chosen
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- From: Ketil Malde
- Cluster computing drawbacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Code density and performance?
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Next by thread: Re: Cluster computing drawbacks
- Index(es):