Re: Open source storage
- From: Cydrome Leader <presence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill Todd wrote:
There's nothing there that even remotely hints at data corruption on
power loss: the defined semantics of any normal Unix-style file
system (including ZFS) specifies that any user data that hasn't been
explicitly flushed to disk may or may not be on the disk, in whole or
in part, should power fail (that's what write-back caching is all
about: ...
Sorry to go off on a tangent but I think it is somewhat relevant since S
was talking about Enterprise storage: How common is it for enterprise
storage vendors to have disks with firmware that makes it impossible to
the enable write-back cache? We have an SGI NAS (IS4500) where this is
the case and it took me a little by surprise, although it does make a
lot of sense when you have 100 TB storage. Does most or all enterprise
storage permanently disable write-back cache?
Thanks,
Steve
Ha, I'm more shocked that anything from SGI is still in use.
.
- References:
- Open source storage
- From: S
- Re: Open source storage
- From: Anton Rang
- Re: Open source storage
- From: the wharf rat
- Re: Open source storage
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Open source storage
- From: S
- Re: Open source storage
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Open source storage
- From: S
- Re: Open source storage
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Open source storage
- From: Steve Cousins
- Open source storage
- Prev by Date: Re: Open source storage
- Next by Date: Re: Open source storage
- Previous by thread: Re: Open source storage
- Next by thread: Re: Open source storage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|