Re: Network Storage Help

scotv453 <scotv453@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:31?pm, w...@xxxxxxxxx (the wharf rat) wrote:
In article <492b3ca1-9b25-4255-a8b6-082e35b8d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

scotv453 ?<scotv...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Now for the question(s)? Should I go with a SAN or a NAS? Keep in mind

? ? ? ? NAS.

? ? ? ? The advantages of a SAN relate to pure performance and its ability
to share storage as block devices. ?That means that the SAN looks like any
other disc drive to the host so to, say, make a network share you'd need to
attach the SAN device to a Windows file server then share the file system
you create. ?But SANs are complicated to set up and administer, and still
more expensive than simple network filesystems.

? ? ? ? Running a network filesystem over gigabit links will certainly provide
adequate performance, and you can most probably find a NAS device that
interacts with Unix as well as Windows. ?I don't see anything in your list
that requires the kind of speed or flexibility a SAN provides and so can't
see any reason to recommend one over an probably cheaper and certainly easier
to manage NAS.

? ? ? ? If you're comfortable with Linux and want to save money there's
no reason not to buy a reasonable SCSI (or even SATA!) disc array (make
sure to plan for adequate expansion both in volume and throughput) and
use a Linux server as the NAS device. ?The redundancy will be built into
the array - if the Linux server dies completely it's easy enough to swap
in something temporary - and if you DO decide to experiment with SAN storage
Linux supports iSCSI just fine. ?And yes, you will need some kind of backup
device.


Thanks for the input everyone. Including the person that said do
nothing. Even that would be an idea, but we do need some type of
backup and storage device.

I still maintain that cheap +backup (or storage) = disaster.

you may want to take a look at Adaptec's Snap Servers. The small rack
mount units are decent.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: StorageTek on SAN with VMS
    ... You seem to have good SAN ... > tape backup system will be tricky if you have not done it before. ... The really shitty part is getting your tape drives recognized by VMS. ... > Volume Shadowing and CI-based storage is a piece of cake. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Exchange 2007 CCR design
    ... There's no question that there is a lot of value add to using SAN storage. ... LAN-Free Snapshot Backups and Replication Can Eliminate Backup Windows. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.design)
  • SUMMARY: SAN Storage best practice
    ... fault tolerant SAN storage is overkill. ... other host side volume management requirements that might exceed what is ... If your storage array is setup to hand out fault tolerant LUN's then it ... --I've been in an organization where double mirroring was seriously ...
    (SunManagers)
  • [HPADM] SUMMARY: SAN to SAN
    ... HP Storage Works SAN ... Also there are are Oracle products for remote ... where you can have both storage frames in the ... replication via the SAN. ...
    (HP-UX-Admin)
  • Re: VMS SAN Primer
    ... (SAN - as in the interconnecting infrastructure). ... have different seperate nodes accesing drives in a SAN, ... you're confusing SANs with MSCP-served storage. ... The best way to think of a storage array is as if a tremendously ...
    (comp.os.vms)