Re: Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- From: "moojit" <moojit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:08:32 -0500
"Fondazione Distrofici Onlus" <info@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189011253.327390.256380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, sorry for bad english..
I've got a Tyan Thunder S2885 and an Adaptec 2810SA, configured as
follows:
- 5 Maxtor 300gb hard disks on adaptec card
- 1 Maxtor 160gb hard disk attached to the motherboard
- 3 RAID5 volumes (partitions) on adaptec card
- 1 partition 1TB
- 1 partition 160 GB
- 1 partition 5GB
After executing a benchmark test, the results surprised me...
All the volumes of the Adaptec card showed the same results:
____________________________________________________________
READ
- sequential read (large files):
- random read (large files):
- sequential read (small files):
- random read (small files):
____________________________________________________________
WRITE
- sequential write (large files):
- random write(large files):
- sequential write(small files):
- random write(small files):
Aren't these results strange for what is said to be an "ideal cost-
effective solution for applications where high levels of sustained
read and write performance are required, including video streaming,
web content, reference data and fixed content storage" ??
Thanks a lot,
Marco
Try DataMover For Windows (http://www.moojit.net/Networking/downloads.shtml)
it may provide better benchmark data. Random I/O is a purely subjective
implementation, DataMover only performs sequential I/O. It tests many
different transfer sizes between 512B and 4MB in half and full duplex
operation.
Moojit
.
- References:
- Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- From: Fondazione Distrofici Onlus
- Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- Prev by Date: USENIX FAST '08 Call For Papers Reminder
- Next by Date: Re: Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- Previous by thread: Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- Next by thread: Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow?
- Index(es):