Re: huge box of ram?

In article <7x8xpqokbq.fsf_-_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there such a thing as a relatively inexpensive box (up to a few K$,
say) that can hold a huge amount of ram, like 200-1000 GB? It doesn't
have to be battery backed or anything like that, but it should have
ECC or at least parity. The application is a high traffic database
cache.


Google "solid state disk" and you might want to add "-CF" to avoid all
the people that want to sell you CF cards.


I'd figure 100 bucks/GB as a WAG for price. How much money do you have?




--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

Don't blame me. I voted for Gore.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do I need a Page File?
    ... >processes that could be handled by the RAM. ... Don't blame me. ... I voted for Gore. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: efficacy of Linux w/o swap
    ... |> dedicated purpose that will use Linux and commodity hardware. ... | I suppose you could lock into RAM, ... can account for such an extreme amount of time. ... then evetually complete the switch. ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
  • Re: xp pro blue screen
    ... Insufficient RAM. ... the amount of RAM, and performance seems to suffer quite badly if and ... Windows Task Manager is basically useless for this type of assessment ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: xp pro blue screen
    ... Insufficient RAM. ... the amount of RAM, and performance seems to suffer quite badly if and ... Windows Task Manager is basically useless for this type of assessment ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: xp pro blue screen
    ... Insufficient RAM. ... the amount of RAM, and performance seems to suffer quite badly if and ... Windows Task Manager is basically useless for this type of assessment ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
Loading