Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: Antti <Antti.Lukats@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
On 30 Mrz., 18:06, austin <aus...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Antti,
You (and everyone else) will probably not believe me, but there have
been beta testers running this for more than 6 months.
Austin
Austin,
sure I belive you! but they are not doing their job! How hard is that
to understand?
If every new major release causes instant frustration and/or has TTFFF
(time to first fatal failure) less than 30 minutes, then your beta-
testers have continously failed todo their job. I cant see it any
other way.
Antti
Antti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: Alain
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- References:
- ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: emeb
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: job
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: austin
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: Antti
- Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- From: austin
- ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- Prev by Date: Re: Synthesisable Timer in VHDL
- Next by Date: Re: Configuring a Spartan 3A1800 ExtremeDSP from Spartan3 cable?
- Previous by thread: Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- Next by thread: Re: ISE 10.1 - Initial experience
- Index(es):