Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- From: Peter Alfke <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:35:02 -0800
A large asynchronous FIFO will always most efficiently be implemented
in a dual-ported BlockRAM, and have a width of 1, 2, 4, 9, 18, or 36
bits. If you need a different width, just pad it to the higher value.
Also Din and Dout have the same width.
Anything different will get very complicated...
The main problem in the design of asynchronous (2-clock) FIFOs is the
reliable generation of the Full and Empty flags at high clock rates.
Peter Alfke, Xilinx
On Nov 14, 11:37 am, "zlotawy" <paraliczb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I have generated a block-ram based FIFO queue (2 independent clocks, 2
inputs, 1 output) with the use of Core Generator. In the creator I used the
36 bit data bus. Is it possible to parameterize this variable?
I think, that the Xilinx doesn't give such possibility. The generated code:
LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.ALL;
-- synthesis translate_off
Library XilinxCoreLib;
-- synthesis translate_on
ENTITY fifa IS
port (
din: IN std_logic_VECTOR(35 downto 0);
rd_clk: IN std_logic;
rd_en: IN std_logic;
rst: IN std_logic;
wr_clk: IN std_logic;
wr_en: IN std_logic;
dout: OUT std_logic_VECTOR(35 downto 0);
empty: OUT std_logic;
full: OUT std_logic);
END fifa;
ARCHITECTURE fifa_a OF fifa IS
-- synthesis translate_off
component wrapped_fifa
port (
din: IN std_logic_VECTOR(35 downto 0);
rd_clk: IN std_logic;
rd_en: IN std_logic;
rst: IN std_logic;
wr_clk: IN std_logic;
wr_en: IN std_logic;
dout: OUT std_logic_VECTOR(35 downto 0);
empty: OUT std_logic;
full: OUT std_logic);
end component;
-- Configuration specification
for all : wrapped_fifa use entity
XilinxCoreLib.fifo_generator_v4_1(behavioral)
generic map(
c_has_int_clk => 0,
c_rd_freq => 1,
c_wr_response_latency => 1,
c_has_srst => 0,
c_has_rd_data_count => 0,
c_din_width => 36,
c_has_wr_data_count => 0,
c_full_flags_rst_val => 1,
c_implementation_type => 2,
c_family => "virtex2p",
c_use_embedded_reg => 0,
c_has_wr_rst => 0,
c_wr_freq => 1,
c_underflow_low => 0,
c_has_meminit_file => 0,
c_has_overflow => 0,
c_preload_latency => 1,
c_dout_width => 36,
c_rd_depth => 1024,
c_default_value => "BlankString",
c_mif_file_name => "BlankString",
c_has_underflow => 0,
c_has_rd_rst => 0,
c_has_almost_full => 0,
c_has_rst => 1,
c_data_count_width => 10,
c_has_wr_ack => 0,
c_use_ecc => 0,
c_wr_ack_low => 0,
c_common_clock => 0,
c_rd_pntr_width => 10,
c_use_fwft_data_count => 0,
c_has_almost_empty => 0,
c_rd_data_count_width => 10,
c_enable_rlocs => 0,
c_wr_pntr_width => 10,
c_overflow_low => 0,
c_prog_empty_type => 0,
c_optimization_mode => 0,
c_wr_data_count_width => 10,
c_preload_regs => 0,
c_dout_rst_val => "0",
c_has_data_count => 0,
c_prog_full_thresh_negate_val => 1020,
c_wr_depth => 1024,
c_prog_empty_thresh_negate_val => 3,
c_prog_empty_thresh_assert_val => 2,
c_has_valid => 0,
c_init_wr_pntr_val => 0,
c_prog_full_thresh_assert_val => 1021,
c_use_fifo16_flags => 0,
c_has_backup => 0,
c_valid_low => 0,
c_prim_fifo_type => "1kx36",
c_count_type => 0,
c_prog_full_type => 0,
c_memory_type => 1);
-- synthesis translate_on
BEGIN
-- synthesis translate_off
U0 : wrapped_fifa
port map (
din => din,
rd_clk => rd_clk,
rd_en => rd_en,
rst => rst,
wr_clk => wr_clk,
wr_en => wr_en,
dout => dout,
empty => empty,
full => full);
-- synthesis translate_on
END fifa_a;
There are 2 parameters: c_din_width =>36 and c_dout_width => 36. I can't
use here values greater than 36. What is the use of this parameters? Can I
change this parameters values to i.e. 20?
I would like to use the queue with different sizes of the data bus. Is it a
good solution to create a maximum size data bus and use it to write there
smaller data?
Or maybe it is better to create a 1bit queue, and with the use of GENERATE
command generate N 1 bit queues to have a N-bit queue?
Device is Virtex2Pro.
Regards,
zlotawy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- From: zlotawy
- Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- From: ghelbig
- Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- References:
- Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- From: zlotawy
- Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- Prev by Date: Re: Non-volatile FPGA in a small package
- Next by Date: Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- Previous by thread: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- Next by thread: Re: Block-ram FIFO in Xilinx
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
