Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: Phil Hays <invalid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:43:47 GMT
vasile wrote:
On Sep 28, 11:30 am, Antti <Antti.Luk...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi
I know many wise men has said NO NO, but
1)http://www.latticesemi.com/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=42&thre...
Lattice engineer suggest that it works (assumable reliable) on machXO
the IO technology between machXO and Xilinx FPGAs isnt so big so I
wonder why cant it be done with Xilinx ?
for what I see is following
25MHz crystal
27p caps
560 series
1M parallel
when using LVCMOS33 SLEW=FAST
This structure works with *any* kind of logic if you understand it has a
pure analogic behaviour and you treat it as a sensitive analogic stuff
(and not a digital one like most software guys do).
Well, no. Back when I was quite a bit younger, I tried to build a stable
oscillator with a unused gate on a TTL 7414, with is an inverter with
hysteresis. Tried all sorts of values of capacitors and resisters, and the
best I was able to do was to usually generate the third harmonic.
Sometimes the fifth, sometimes some other multiple of the crystal
frequency, sometimes not a stable frequency, and sometimes even the
frequency of the crystal. Switched to using a 7404, a plain inverter, and
then making a stable oscillator was easy.
--
Phil Hays
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: Hal Murray
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- References:
- 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: Antti
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: vasile
- 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Prev by Date: Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Next by Date: Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Next by thread: Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Index(es):