2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: Antti <Antti.Lukats@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:30:15 -0000
Hi
I know many wise men has said NO NO, but
1)
http://www.latticesemi.com/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=42&threadid=3505
Lattice engineer suggest that it works (assumable reliable) on machXO
the IO technology between machXO and Xilinx FPGAs isnt so big so I
wonder why cant it be done with Xilinx ?
for what I see is following
25MHz crystal
27p caps
560 series
1M parallel
when using LVCMOS33 SLEW=FAST
then there is some sort of overdrive, that makes oscillation to
periodically stop and restart
200 us work then 75 idle, then restarts again, the FPGA input sees
however nice 25MHz
from the crystal ALL time, (also when the output doesnt swing)
by simply changing slew=slow the circuit does start work reliable.
so any technical reasons why this circuit can not (should not) be
used??
crystal vs oscillator price difference is still some 0.30 USD, so why
waste the pennies
Antti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: vasile
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- From: austin
- Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Prev by Date: Re: LVDS clock management
- Next by Date: Programming the ARM7 used to download our Xilinx FPGA
- Previous by thread: LVDS clock management
- Next by thread: Re: 2 leg crystal on FPGA: Lattice vs Xilinx
- Index(es):