Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- From: Antti <Antti.Lukats@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 05:06:51 -0700
On 30 Apr., 13:49, "comp.arch.fpga" <ksuli...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I find I quite normal, that software has bugs. Even stupid bugs
are a reality.
OTOH, what really pisses me of are bugs that are known and easy to fix
but remain
in the software for years anyway.
An example like this is the lack of support for the default windows
install directory "program files".
And the lack of support for the german default user directory "Eigene
Dateien".
If it really is that hard to support file names with spaces, at least
the install script should prevent
me from installing to that location.
Kolja Sulimma
Ehe..
I remember that I once entered ä letter in the comment field of
schematic header in the Xilinx Schematic editor.
As result the all file was seen as invalid.. Had to use hex editor to
change ä to a, then it did open again.
The EDK 9.1 story isnt ended unfortunatly... I am using now the manual
XST trick to pass the build...
but the once working 8.1 design, in 9.1 there is not even console
printout anymore (it worked in 8.2)
and whats even worse the XMD is not able to connect either so cant
debug at all...
Antti
And yes, if anybody asks, I just installed all 9.1 service packs 1.7
GBYTE download!
.
- References:
- Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- From: Antti
- Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- From: Tim
- Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- From: Antti
- Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- From: comp.arch.fpga
- Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- Prev by Date: Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- Next by Date: weird PACE Error, not one google result
- Previous by thread: Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- Next by thread: Re: Xilinx software quality - how low can it go ?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
