Prefered ieee libraries?
- From: David Ashley <dash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:10:06 -0700
I'm at a critical point before I build up too much code.
Which is the more preferred/forward thinking approach?
library IEEE;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.std_logic_arith.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;
-- then used to_integer, etc.
or
library IEEE;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
-- then use conv_integer, etc.
Thanks! Hope this isn't a question of religion...
-Dave
--
David Ashley http://www.xdr.com/dash
Embedded linux, device drivers, system architecture
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prefered ieee libraries?
- From: Jeff Cunningham
- Re: Prefered ieee libraries?
- From: Ray Andraka
- Re: Prefered ieee libraries?
- Prev by Date: Re: resets on synplicity inferred RAMs
- Next by Date: Re: Spartan3E availability
- Previous by thread: resets on synplicity inferred RAMs
- Next by thread: Re: Prefered ieee libraries?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|