Re: placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- From: "KJ" <Kevin.Jennings@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 06:06:53 -0700
Austin Lesea wrote:
Rick,My memory is fuzzy on this (and other topics for that matter) but I
Via in pad (basically no trace) is best. Placement is not critical, as
long as you have via in pad, and planes.
think via in pad creates an assembly issue because the pad of the part
is physically blocking the via (by design). Unfortunately I don't
recall the specifics, maybe someone else recalls.
Unless you already understand the issue (that I've conveniently
forgotten) I would suggest that whoever is going to be building your
boards be consulted to understand if there are appropriate tradeoffs
that can be made prior to planning to use 'via in pad' since
manufacturability is also generally a concern that at least must be
taken into consideration and evalutated.
KJ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- From: Austin Lesea
- Re: placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- From: rickman
- Re: placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- From: Austin Lesea
- placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- Prev by Date: Re: high level languages for synthesis
- Next by Date: Re: Do I need to adjust sdram clk shift when i lower my system clock?
- Previous by thread: Re: placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- Next by thread: Re: placing addiional caps across existing caps to reduce noise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|