Re: Large Spartan3 vs. Small V5



Here is a shot at it,

See below,

Austin

-snip-

So is Xilinx working on another budget-line FPGA?

Yes. Always. It is "our business."

Or are they intending
that small V5 chips replace the Spartan line altogether?

No. We sorted that out, the Virtex line is no longer interested in "small" parts.

What's their
next budget chip with the new LUT structure and when can I look for it?

I can't tell you something like that! One thing you can always count on: Moore's Law. Is 65nm smaller and cheaper? Yes. And 45nm, yes again. And so on.

According to Xilinx's website, the Spartan-3E line is for gate-centric
uses and goes up to 1.2M gates. Yeah. Huge.

For some, yes, others not. It is all about marketing. Sell to the ones who have the money. Cost of mask set, etc. How many did you want?

I just finished a project that uses 4.5M gates (so says the MRP) on
each of eight 2v6000 chips. It's only using 1/3 the block RAM and none
of the MUL blocks on any chip. It only accesses DRAM from one chip. I
want that project on cheap hardware.

Congratulations on your accomplishment...

What chips would you recommend for
this? By cheap I mean $40/chip, not $2000/chip.

Well, four 2V6000s is now proabably replaced by 5VLX220. That doesn't include any intelligent re-targeting to structures that are better suited (ie more compact) or design changes to fit it into a smaller device. 5VLX220 will not be "introduced" until later (just keep watch on the announcements).

As for less than $40 (for a LX220), well, that doesn't seem likely, even at 65nm.

Maybe next time? From the Virtex 1000, to the Spartan 3S1000, the price to the user has diminshed by more than two decades (for the same, or more, logic).
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet Another Graphics Controller
    ... These chips where used in MSX ... Of course, my YaGraphCon has less features, but it is my first graphics ... and it would need less block RAM. ... MOST of the readers havent. ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)
  • Re: Large Spartan3 vs. Small V5
    ... each of eight 2v6000 chips. ... It's only using 1/3 the block RAM and none ... In the case of code-breaking applications, as long as you pick FPGAs large enough to contain at least one instance of the code-breaking unit, you will not need to worry about interconnects. ... The rest is simply a matter of setting performance targets, selecting an FPGA family then cost-optimize the device count, size and speed grade - code-breaking is generally so parallelizable that there is very little to no performance gain between a single large-scale system and N N-times as slow smaller-scale ones. ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)
  • Re: Advice Misnomers
    ... It could have been "reseed" (obviously intending "re seat"):) ... And here's one that gets me but relates to grammar. ... was to receed the chips. ...
    (rec.games.video.arcade.collecting)
  • Re: Audio uC Development Board
    ... It looks like these chips are available now and I am intending to do some audio work with these chips. ... Putting them on a dip adapter is one of the first things I do anyway, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Large Spartan3 vs. Small V5
    ... each of eight 2v6000 chips. ... It's only using 1/3 the block RAM ... Can you move any of your storage into block ... Ben Jackson AD7GD ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)