Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- From: antti.tyrvainen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Jul 2006 03:18:17 -0700
mk kirjoitti:
By the way, why do you perform post P&R simulation for power analysis?
Isn't functional simulation activity output enough?
Do you know if post P&R simulation really gives a benefit over
functional simulation for power analysis?
Antti
With current FPGAs where routing delay can be more than half of the
total delay, p&r results can be quite important in power. How long a
route is and how many buffers it goes through certainly impacts the
power consumption.
Yes, but does the power tool really need post P&R simulation .vcd for
that?
Isn't P&R netlist enough?
Can't you use functional .vcd together with post P&R netlist?
Antti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- From: amirhossein . gholamipour
- Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- From: antti . tyrvainen
- Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- From: mk
- Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- Prev by Date: Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- Next by Date: Re: Programming the Spartan-3E Starter Kit using Linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- Next by thread: Re: Micorblaze post place and route simulation...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|