Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron <News5@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:15:39 -0700
Mike Harrison wrote:
Presumably you could do it rather quicker using the S3's multiplier blocks.....
Good point, but then I'd be tied into a particular FPGA. The multipliers are very impressive however. If I ever get my design to fit on something, then I can start taking advantage of things like the built-in multipliers to speed things up. Lets see, 18x18->36 bits in less than 5 ns. For a 1024 bit multiply, it would take roughly 1,624 eighteen bit multiplies and a bunch of multi-precision additions, which translates into around 8 microseconds per 1024 bit word! Very impressive indeed.
Ron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Jerry Coffin
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- References:
- Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Thomas Womack
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Peter Alfke
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Thomas Womack
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Ron
- Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- From: Mike Harrison
- Xilinx 3s8000?
- Prev by Date: Re: FPGA-based hardware accelerator for PC
- Next by Date: Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- Previous by thread: Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- Next by thread: Re: Xilinx 3s8000?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|