Re: Xilinx Legal - topic beat to death

Austin Lesea wrote:
> I see. Seems we never even disclosed the basics of the XDL format. I
> had thought that we had disclosed its construction, and structure.

> Well then. Looks like XDL is off limits, too.

> Now that we have that understood, perhaps we can retire this entire
> thread and move onto something else?

Sure ... I think we have more than hashed this to death :(

It's probably better at this point to lobby it as a business decision
with
sales/marketing and real customers.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XDL Tools wiki site
    ... Seems we never even disclosed the basics of the XDL format. ... I had thought that we had disclosed its construction, ... Now that we have that understood, perhaps we can retire this entire thread and move onto something else? ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)
  • Re: So Xilinx, is XDL and related libraries an available open source interface? NO!
    ... Austin Lesea wrote: ... Seems we never even disclosed the basics of the XDL format. ... > had thought that we had disclosed its construction, ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)
  • Re: XDL Tools wiki site
    ... Austin Lesea wrote: ... Seems we never even disclosed the basics of the XDL format. ... > had thought that we had disclosed its construction, ...
    (comp.arch.fpga)