Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: cs_posting@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Jan 2006 14:32:55 -0800
fpga_toys@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I can not personally broker a deal for an open source project, because
> I can not control the use and modification of the project in the open
> public. I would not accept the personal liability should Xilinx think I
> could even control what happens to the information after we publish
> it.
>
> So public discussion, that all can use is the only productive forum
> for open source uses.
I think you could get the ball rolling with some email, but I agree
that all of the 'decisions' woul d have to be very public, and even
enough late-stage discussion to illuminate them, for the result to be
of any use for a free and open project.
It seems like you are hoping Xilinx legal will meet you here. That
might be a good result, but you may have to first talk to them on their
turf to issue the invitation.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: Phil Tomson
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: fpga_toys
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- References:
- Xilinx Legal
- From: Austin Lesea
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: fpga_toys
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: Austin Lesea
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: fpga_toys
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: Austin Lesea
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: cs_posting
- Re: Xilinx Legal
- From: fpga_toys
- Xilinx Legal
- Prev by Date: Re: So Xilinx, is XDL and related libraries an available open source interface?
- Next by Date: Open source access to generate netlists into Altera tools? Others?
- Previous by thread: Re: Xilinx Legal
- Next by thread: Re: Xilinx Legal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|