Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: "John Adair" <removethisthenleavejea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:59:31 -0000
We have not yet done a chapter and verse on this yet but for the full
version with 6 BARs, worst case configuration, it is less than 1000 slices.
You have about 3600 slices in a XC3S400. I have not got a definative answer
beause we have number of modules in with in for debug purposes ans some more
debug to do so some other things there to muddy the number.
We have designed the core to reduce in size in an optimal fashion if
features are removed etc. So a single BAR configuration is likely to have a
couple of hundred slices less. As yet the exact numbers have not been
formally noted but we can see the size reduction if we twiddle the
parameters that reduce functionality.
John Adair
Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of UAP. Enterpoint's University Access Program.
http://www.enterpoint.co.uk
"Xavier T" <xavier.tastet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1137702243.561963.71120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with the core you're working on, how many space left to implement
> design ? x3s400 means 400k gates ?
> X.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: Xavier T
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- References:
- Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: xavier.tastet@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: John Adair
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: Phil Tomson
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: John Adair
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: Phil Tomson
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: John Adair
- Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- From: Xavier T
- Raggedstone specifications ...
- Prev by Date: Sorting large amounts of floats
- Next by Date: Re: ISE8.1 on Linux, first impressions
- Previous by thread: Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- Next by thread: Re: Raggedstone specifications ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|