Re: Verilog Editor.

For my mind I would agree.. I want a editor that edits files.. the more
bells and whistles the more there is to break and the slower it runs.. How
many people complain about bloatwere from MS? An editor is an editor... I
will accept searching but revision control is best done outside... We have
HDL designer at work and using VSS it runs like a 2 legged dog... (no
offence to animal lovers) but VSS itself checks in and out the same files in
a serious fraction of the time.

Simon

"Bob Perlman" <bobsrefusebin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q91gn1h89n6fn6fmtjljbdacdidb4dqkpj@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 13 Nov 2005 18:30:33 -0800, jussij@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >> At $39.95, it costs the same as Zeus.
> >
> >Just curious. For the same price, does UltraEdit also come with
> >integrate version control, class browsing, intellisensing and
> >macro scripting?
> >
> >The last time I checked, for these extra programming features you
> >needed to move up to the UltraEdit Studio which comes in at twice
> >the price.
>
> Plain old UltraEdit has macro scripting. For version control, I use
> the Tortoise extension for subversion. As for the other features you
> mentioned, I don't know; I don't use them. And I also configure
> UltraEdit to run emacs Verilog mode in batch to get quick generation
> of port lists, etc.
>
> >> And when you report a bug, they fix it, quickly.
> >
> >Zeus is no different in this regard.
>
> Nor would I suggest otherwise.
>
> I posted not to disparage anyone else's editor, but to say that
> UltraEdit is nothing short of terrific. I don't use many software
> packages that elict grudging acceptance, much less praise, so when I
> find a good one, I like to spread the word.
>
> Bob Perlman
> Cambrian Design Works


.

Loading