Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: 8 Oct 2007 08:42:46 GMT
In article <2ZWdnaP0_9h88pTanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|>
|> > For reasons that a hardware person might be able to explain, the
|> > exception when the quotient overflows is sometimes divide by zero.
|> > It can also be unexpected in other ways.
|>
|> http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dz9zr003/6.5.2.18
Yes, but why THAT exception?
|> For S/360 the usual way to do divide was to load the dividend into
|> the high word and then do an arithmetic right shift of 32 bits.
Yes. Not all architectures support that.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- References:
- Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Total order on floating point numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|