Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: 7 Oct 2007 18:40:16 GMT
|> 'ed' has exactly such a
|> bug at 32767, which is why it was unsafe to use on system files
|> like /etc/passwd.
I should have said the original 'ed'.
Note that many systems don't use the original 'ed', for precisely
that sort of reason. I don't know how many of them have fixed that
one, as I haven't used it since I discovered that bug.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- References:
- Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Total order on floating point numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Total order on floating point numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|