Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- From: ram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Stefan Ram)
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 03:51:36 GMT
Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
That assumption is unfounded. Java programs still have a moderate
penalty in terms of memory usage, but generally have little or no
penalty in terms of run-time.
If you consider a factor of "1.7" (on the average of certain
benchmarks) to be "little or nothing".
"1.0 C++ GNU g++
1.7 Java 6 -server"
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
Take for example Jruby, the Java implementation of Ruby.
It is generally *faster* than the C implementation.
Faster than Ruby 1.8.x, which is a pure interpreter.
Ruby 1.9 is about three times as fast.
[ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- From: Isaac Gouy
- Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- References:
- PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- From: Tim vor der Brück
- Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- From: Ted Dunning
- PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- Prev by Date: Chatbot Game: A chatbot that you can improve by playing a game.
- Next by Date: Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- Previous by thread: Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- Next by thread: Re: PRM (Predictive Rule Mining)
- Index(es):