Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?

From: "A.L." <fela@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:01:50 GMT

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:05:22 GMT, jonesrob@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hofstadter has said (Godel, Escher, Bach... Basic Books,
1979) that "below every tangled hierarchy lies an
inviolate level." But is this true? Over the past few years
I have been developing my Asa (Autonomous Software
Agent) AIs. At first Asa was a pair of neural networks
(Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., vol. 100, pg 85, 1997),

What is "Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci"?...

A.L.

[ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
  - From: doslong

References:
- Must every AI have an inviolate level?
  - From: jonesrob

Prev by Date: Re: With vector utility is one less likely to get stuck in local maxima?
Next by Date: Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
Previous by thread: Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
Next by thread: Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Must every AI have an inviolate level?
... Hofstadter has said (Godel, Escher, Bach... ... I have been developing my Asa (Autonomous Software ... the "inviolate level" but I don't think that is what Hofstadter ...
(comp.ai)
Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
... I have been developing my Asa (Autonomous Software ... the "inviolate level" but I don't think that is what Hofstadter ... And of course we are not at the bottom of physics yet ...
(comp.ai)
Re: Must every AI have an inviolate level?
... I have been developing my Asa (Autonomous Software ... The programming language ... the "inviolate level" but I don't think that is what Hofstadter ...
(comp.ai)