Re: Emotional programming
- From: "A..L." <alewando@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:49:53 GMT
On Wed, 17 May 2006 00:16:10 GMT, "Mr Terence Jardine"
<s4056847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2006 01:29:10 GMT, "Crazy" <Sumitava.M@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I intend to provide (write) a library in C++ to simulate emotions.
As soon as you define what it is "emotion" your task will be easy.
A.L.
If you are emulating emotions then emotions would appear to be another sort of
memory and nothing more. I don't see how a library of emotions would prove
useful in a variety of artificial contexts without a groundbreaking philosophy
for emotion.
I am not emulating emotion, I reponded to question about simulating
emotion. You are responding to wrong person.
Anyway, I was trying to understand your answer in the context of
original question and don't understand your point.
A.L.
[ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]
.
- References:
- Re: Emotional programming
- From: A..L.
- Re: Re: Emotional programming
- From: Mr Terence Jardine
- Re: Emotional programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Origin of the word "production rules" and "productions"
- Next by Date: Re: Emotional programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Emotional programming
- Next by thread: Re: Emotional programming
- Index(es):