Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Vend <vend82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
On 25 Mar, 15:39, "Alpha" <OmegaZero2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Vend" <ven...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1a15e7fd-7fa2-453d-ad21-3b6910916374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 22 Mar, 20:23, "Alpha" <OmegaZero2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Show that the APs of a neuron(s) (or any other property of a neuron or
group/net of neurons, or whatever other property of brain you want to
identify with experience) are *identical * with the experience of red.
Do
so without bringing in your delusional conditioning/religious beliefs in
swirling atoms and such. Use the real scientific method. Posit an
hypothesis and provide experimental data that shows such identity.
I think you have it backwards.
Nope;
Curt is making the claim that it *is* identical* , not me.
If you claim that they aren't, the burden of proof is on you.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Alpha
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: forbisgaryg
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- References:
- Challenge to Curt
- From: Alpha
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Vend
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Alpha
- Challenge to Curt
- Prev by Date: Re: The Brain
- Next by Date: Re: Is AI for sexual robots up and ***?
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Index(es):