Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Vend <vend82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
On 22 Mar, 20:23, "Alpha" <OmegaZero2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Show that the APs of a neuron(s) (or any other property of a neuron or
group/net of neurons, or whatever other property of brain you want to
identify with experience) are *identical * with the experience of red. Do
so without bringing in your delusional conditioning/religious beliefs in
swirling atoms and such. Use the real scientific method. Posit an
hypothesis and provide experimental data that shows such identity.
I think you have it backwards.
The burden is on you to show that the "experience of red" exists and
it's distinct from a class of neural electrochemical states.
Otherwise, the Occam's razor tells us that "experience of red" either
doesn't exist or is another name for "class of electrochemical states
that occour in the brain when it's visually exposed to red light".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: Alpha
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- From: forbisgaryg
- Re: Challenge to Curt
- References:
- Challenge to Curt
- From: Alpha
- Challenge to Curt
- Prev by Date: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Next by Date: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge to Curt
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
