Re: hello?
- From: "Wolf K." <wolfkir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:40:00 -0500
N wrote:
On 4 Mar, 04:42, RichD <r_delaney2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mar 3, casey <jgkjca...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There were some smart folks here, worth
talking to... of course, the usual
assortment of nitwits, like every group...
you have to figure out which is which...
count our blessings for our genetic variations, otherwise
... there could have been only one writer with a variety of
different names,
:)
n.
I've been mulling over why I think the computational approach will not work. The claim that any working device can be simulated in software is the stumbling block. A glimmer of refutation of this principle comes from considering chaotic systems, which can not be thus simulated. Will get back when I've sorted out my thoughts.
Such as they are. ;-)
--
wolf k.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hello?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: hello?
- From: Albert van der Horst
- Re: hello?
- From: Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: hello?
- From: PeskyBee
- Re: hello?
- References:
- Re: hello?
- From: casey
- Re: hello?
- From: RichD
- Re: hello?
- From: N
- Re: hello?
- Prev by Date: Re: hello?
- Next by Date: Urine Therapy. FREE MOVIES. Thorium as fuel for reactors (manic-depressives are intelligent)
- Previous by thread: Re: hello?
- Next by thread: Re: hello?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|